今天大學路小編整理了雅思劍橋5閱讀text1 2023年9月28日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案相關信息,希望在這方面能夠更好的大家。
本文目錄一覽:
2023年9月28日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案
您好,我是專注留學考試規(guī)劃和留學咨詢的小鐘老師。在追尋留學夢想的路上,選擇合適的學校和專業(yè),準備相關考試,都可能讓人感到迷茫和困擾。作為一名有經驗的留學顧問,我在此為您提供全方位的專業(yè)咨詢和指導。歡迎隨時提問!
昨天剛剛結束了最新一期的雅思考試,大家有沒有被難倒呢?接下來就跟著小鐘老師來看一看2023年9月28日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案。
Passage1: 希臘硬幣Greek coinage
參考答案:
1. 希臘coin早在3000年就出現(xiàn)了=F
2. T
3. Sparta地區(qū)侵略Athens并強制Athens用他們的貨幣=F
4. Great coins在整個歐洲流傳=F
5. Persian 入侵了Lydia并且使用人家的硬幣=T
6. 用硬幣上的頭像來獎勵做出杰出貢獻的人=NG
7. mint
8. stamps
9. anvil
10. reserve dies
11. 希臘硬幣的重量至少=0.15g
12. 硬幣的圖案=the king的頭像
13. 希臘被波斯征服之前的花紋是lion and doil
14. coin 在雅典被稱為 owl
Passage2: 悉尼交通標識Street markers in Sydney
Passage3: Musical Maladies
參考答案:
A. Music and the brain are both endlessly fascinating subjects, and as a neuroscientist specializing in auditory learning and memory, I find them especially intriguing. So I had high expectations of Musicophilia, the latest offering from neurologist and prolific author Oliver Sacks. And I confess to feeling a little guilty reporting that my reactions to the book are mixed.
B. Sacks himself is the best part of Musicophilia. He richly documents his own life in the book and reveals highly personal experiences. The photograph of him>C. The preface gives a good idea of what the book will deliver. In it Sacks explains that he wants to convey the insights gleaned from the enormous and rapidly growing body of work>complex and often bizarre disorders to which these are prone." He also stresses the importance of the simple art of observation" and the richness of the human context. He wants to combine observation and description with the latest in technology,” he says, and to imaginatively enter into the experience of his patients and subjects. The reader can see that Sacks, who has been practicing neurology for 40 years, is torn between the old-fashioned path of observation and the new-fangled, high-tech approach: He knows that he needs to take heed of the latter, but his heart lies with the former.
D. The book consists mainly of detailed descriptions of cases, most of them involving patients whom Sacks has seen in his practice. Brief discussions of contemporary neuroscientific reports are sprinkled liberally throughout the text. Part I, Haunted by Music," begins with the strange case of Tony Cicoria, a nonmusical, middle-aged surgeon who was consumed by a love of music after being hit by lightning. He suddenly began to crave listening to piano music, which he had never cared for in the past. He started to play the piano and then to compose music, which arose spontaneously in his mind in a torrent of notes. How could this happen? Was I the cause psychological? (He had had a near-death experience when the lightning struck him.) Or was it the direct result of a change in the auditory regions of his cerebral cortex? Electro-encephalography (EEG) showed his brain waves to be normal in the mid-1990s, just after his trauma and subsequent conversion to music. There are now more sensitive tests, but Cicoria has declined to undergo them; he does not want to delve into the causes of his musicality. What a shame!
E. Part II, “A Range of Musicality,” covers a wider variety of topics,but unfortunately, some of the chapters offer little or nothing that is new. For example, chapter 13, which is five pages long, merely notes that the blind often have better hearing than the sighted. The most interesting chapters are those that present the strangest cases. Chapter 8 is about “ amusia, ” an inability to hear sounds as music, and “dysharmonia,”a highly specific impairment of the ability to hear harmony, with the ability to understand melody left intact. Such specific dissociations are found throughout the cases Sacks recounts.
F. To Sacks's credit, part III, "Memory, Movement and Music," brings us into the underappreciated realm of music therapy. Chapter 16 explains how "melodic intonation therapy" is being used to help expressive aphasic patients (those unable to express their thoughts verbally following a stroke or other cerebral incident)>G. To readers who are unfamiliar with neuroscience and music behavior, Musicophilia may be something of a revelation. But the book will not satisfy those seeking the causes and implications of the phenomena Sacks describes. For>appears to be more at ease discussing patients than discussing experiments. And he tends to be rather uncritical in accepting scientific findings and theories.
H. It's true that the causes of music-brain oddities remain poorly understood. However, Sacks could have done more to draw out some of the implications of the careful observations that he and other neurologists have made and of the treatments that have been successful. For example, he might have noted that the many specific dissociations among components of music comprehension, such as loss of the ability to perceive harmony but not melody, indicate that there is no music center in the brain. Because many people who read the book are likely to believe in the brain localization of all mental functions, this was a missed educational opportunity.
I. Another conclusion>patient. Treatments mentioned seem to be almost exclusively antiepileptic medications, which "damp down" the excitability of the brain in general; their effectiveness varies widely.
J. Finally, in many of the cases described here the patient with music-brain symptoms is reported to have "normal" EEG results. Although Sacks recognizes the existence of new technologies, among them far more sensitive ways to *yze brain waves than the standard neurological EEG test, he does not call for their use. In fact, although he exhibits the greatest compassion for patients, he conveys no sense of urgency about the pursuit of new avenues in the diagnosis and treatment of music-brain disorders. This absence echoes the book's preface, in which Sacks expresses fear that the simple art of observation may be lost" if we rely too much on new technologies. He does call for both approaches, though, and we can only hope that the neurological community will respond.
27-30:B C A A
31-36:YES NG NO NG YES NO
37-40:F B A D
希望以上的答復能對您的留學申請有所幫助。如果您有任何更詳細的問題或需要進一步的協(xié)助,我強烈推薦您訪問我們的留學官方網(wǎng)站
,在那里您可以找到更多專業(yè)的留學考試規(guī)劃和留學資料以及*的咨詢服務。祝您留學申請順利!
詢問劍橋雅思5 TEST1的一道閱讀題
這個問題我也沒有得到一個準確的答案。
據(jù)我目前的理解是,題目中有三個關鍵詞:
forcus, mainly, language.
and illustrated their meanings with some 114,000 quotations drawn from the Elizabethans to his own time.這個定位存在以下問題:
1、說的是字典中的詞匯的釋義引用的文獻的年代,相對于language來說范圍較小
2、沒有提到mainly用的是哪個年代的
題目中說的是當代語言。
而后面有treat english very practically, as a living language.注重英語的實踐性,也就是當代性。
一點見解,希望樓主找到答案后與大家分享分享。
劍橋雅思5閱讀難度
較低。劍橋雅思5閱讀材料的難度系數(shù)是相對較低的,適合于入門或者初級學習者練習閱讀。一般而言,劍橋雅思5閱讀材料的難度與英語水平A2-B1水平相當,主要特點是:
1、詞匯量相對較低,詞匯難度不高。
2、句子結構相對簡單,沒有太多復雜的語法結構和從句,語言表達相對直白。
3、篇章組織結構比較簡單,主題清晰明了。
4、閱讀材料的篇幅較短,大多數(shù)文章僅有1-2頁。
以上就是大學路小編給大家?guī)淼难潘紕?閱讀text1 2023年9月28日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案全部內容,希望對大家有所幫助!