劍橋雅思9t3閱讀翻譯 誰有雅思9分達人閱讀3《The Bridge that Swayed>的答案，急用，謝謝

劍橋雅思9t3閱讀翻譯 誰有雅思9分達人閱讀3《The Bridge that Swayed>的答案，急用，謝謝相關內容，小編在這里做了整理，希望能對大家有所幫助，關于劍橋雅思9t3閱讀翻譯 誰有雅思9分達人閱讀3《The Bridge that Swayed>的答案，急用，謝謝信息，一起來了解一下吧！

本文目錄一覽：

• 1、誰有雅思9分達人閱讀3《The Bridge that Swayed>的答案，急用，謝謝
• 2、劍橋雅思閱讀翻譯
• 3、【雅思閱讀翻譯】C4T1P3——視覺符號與盲人

誰有雅思9分達人閱讀3《The Bridge that Swayed>的答案，急用，謝謝

參考答案：1．他去鄉(xiāng)下接爺爺進城住時發(fā)現(xiàn)爺爺為“幫”他還房債而去工廠做工。
2.“我”瞞著爺爺借錢*了房子。爺爺瞞著“我”去工廠做工。
3.反襯出了爺爺?shù)纳屏肌⒋葠酆蜔o私。
4.示例：外貌描寫。如“他穿一件洗得發(fā)白的藍色工裝，因為瘦，衣服像大了一碼，風很大，爺爺?shù)陌装l(fā)被吹得亂蓬蓬的?！笨坍嬃藸敔敼?jié)儉、辛勞的特點。
5.①從“我”的角度，圍繞孝順、懂事等展開，言之有理即可。②從爺爺?shù)慕嵌?，圍繞善良、無私、節(jié)儉、樸實、慈愛等展開，言之有理即可。（任選一角度）

劍橋雅思閱讀翻譯

然而，由于定義不清的問題，直接影響到了統(tǒng)計計量，欲提供世界范圍的旅游參與度的精確數(shù)據(jù)，不太可能有很大程度上的準確數(shù)據(jù)的。
with any degree of certainty to provide的意思，多大程度的確信程度來提供數(shù)據(jù)，意思是你提供的數(shù)據(jù)的準確性程度如何

【雅思閱讀翻譯】C4T1P3——視覺符號與盲人

You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27–40 which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.

From a number of recent studies, it has become clear that blind people can appreciate the use of outlines and perspectives to describe the arrangement of objects and other surfaces in space. But pictures are more than literal representations. This fact was drawn to my attention dramatically when a blind woman in one of my investigations decided on her own initiative to draw a wheel as it was spinning. To show this motion, she traced a curve inside the circle (Fig. 1). I was taken aback. Lines of motion, such as the one she used, are a very recent invention in the history of illustration. Indeed, as art scholar David Kunzle notes, Wilhelm Busch, a trend-setting nineteenth-century cartoonist, used virtually no motion lines in his popular figures until about 1877.

最近的一系列研究表明，盲人可以理解用輪廓線和透視圖表示的物體排列及空中的其他表面。但是圖片表達的意思更勝于文字表述。當我研究的一位盲人女性自發(fā)地劃出一個正在滾動的車輪時，這個現(xiàn)象極大地吸引了我的注意。為了展示車輪的運動，她在圓的中心畫了一條曲線。我被嚇了一跳。表示運動的線，例如她剛畫的這條，是插圖史上最近才有的發(fā)明。事實上，正如藝術學者David Kunzle所說，引領了19世紀潮流的卡通畫家Wilhelm Busch直到1877年之前都沒有在他最流行的人物形象中使用動態(tài)線條。

When I asked several other blind study subjects to draw a spinning wheel, one particularly clever rendition appeared repeatedly: several subjects showed the wheel’s?spokes as curved lines. When asked about these curves, they all described them as metaphorical ways of suggesting motion. Majority rule would argue that this device somehow indicated motion very well. But was it a better indicator than, say, broken or wavy lines – or any other kind of line, for that matter? The answer was not clear. So I decided to test whether various lines of motion were apt ways of showing movement or if they were merely idiosyncratic marks. Moreover, I wanted to discover whether there were differences in how the blind and the sighted interpreted lines of motion.

當我要求其他接受研究的盲人畫一個滾動的輪子時，一種很聰明的畫法反復出現(xiàn)了：一些盲人把車輪的輻條畫成了曲線。當被問到這些曲線時，他們都說這是一種表示運動的比喻手法。多數(shù)人規(guī)則，會認為，這種方式可以很好地表示運動。但是對于這種現(xiàn)象。會不會有種更好的表示方法，例如虛線和波浪線，或其他形式的線呢？答案還不明確。所以我決定測試各種表示運動的線條分別適合表示哪種運動，或者也許它們只是一些特殊符號。而且，我想要發(fā)現(xiàn)盲人和普通人眼中表示運動的線條有沒有什么區(qū)別。

To search out these answers, I created raised-line drawings of five different wheels, depicting spokes with lines that curved, bent, waved, dashed and extended beyond the perimeter of the wheel. I then asked eighteen blind volunteers to feel the wheels and assign one of the following motions to each wheel: wobbling, spinning fast, spinning steadily, jerking or braking. My control group consisted of eighteen sighted undergraduates from the University of Toronto.

為了找出答案，我用凸起的線條畫出了五個輪子，分別把輻條畫成了曲線、折線、波浪線、虛線和伸出車輪的線。接著，我請18位盲人志愿者觸摸輪子，并請他們把每個輪子對應在以下運動中：搖晃、迅速轉動、穩(wěn)定轉動、顛簸或剎車。我的對照組由18多倫多大學的普通大學生組成。

All but one of the blind subjects assigned distinctive motions to each wheel. Most guessed that the curved spokes indicated that the wheel was spinning steadily; the wavy spokes, they thought, suggested that the wheel was wobbling; and the bent spokes were taken as a sign that the wheel was jerking. Subjects assumed that spokes extending beyond the wheel’s perimeter signified that the wheel had its brakes on and that dashed spokes indicated the wheel was spinning quickly.

除了其中一人，所有的盲人都把不同的運動與輪子相對應了。大部分人猜測曲線輻條表示輪子在平穩(wěn)轉動，波浪輻條表示車輪在搖晃，折線車輪表示車子受到顛簸。受試者猜測，輻條伸出車輪邊緣表示輪子處于剎車狀態(tài)，而虛線表示輪子在快速轉動。

In addition, the favored description for the sighted was the favored description for the blind in every instance. What is more, the consensus among the sighted was barely higher than that among the blind. Because motion devices are unfamiliar to the blind, the task I gave them involved some problem solving. Evidently, however, the blind not only figured out meanings for each line of motion, but as a group they generally came up with the same meaning at least as frequently as did sighted subjects.

另外，普通人喜愛的表達與盲人喜愛的表達基本一致。而且普通人之間的共識度并不比盲人高。因為盲人對運動裝置并不熟悉，所以我給他們的任務中也包括解決一些問題。但是，很明顯，盲人不僅搞明白了線條運動的意義，而且作為一個團隊，他們達成共識的普遍頻率也不比普通人低。

We have found that the blind understand other kinds of visual metaphors as well. One blind woman drew a picture of a child inside a heart – choosing that symbol, she said, to show that love surrounded the child. With Chang Hong Liu, a doctoral student from China, I have begun exploring how well blind people understand the symboli* behind shapes such as hearts that do not directly represent their meaning. We gave a list of twenty pairs of words to sighted subjects and asked them to pick from each pair the term that best related to a circle and the term that best related to a square. For example, we asked: What goes with soft? A circle or a square? Which shape goes with hard?

我們發(fā)現(xiàn)，盲人也能理解其他種類的視覺符號。一個盲人女性在一個心形中間畫了一個小孩——她說，選擇這個符號，是為了表示孩子被愛包圍。于是我和一個中國博士生劉長虹開始研究：盲人對于心形這樣不直接表達含義的符號背后的意義，到底理解到了什么樣的程度。我們給了普通人20對單詞，并要求他們在每一對單詞中選擇一個代表圓圈的和一個代表方框的。比方說，我們問：哪個表示柔軟呢？圓圈還是方框？哪個又表示堅硬？

All our subjects deemed the circle soft and the square hard. A full 94% ascribed happy to the circle, instead of sad. But other pairs revealed less agreement: 79% matched fast to slow and weak to strong, respectively. And only 51% linked deep to circle and shallow to square. (See Fig. 2) When we tested four totally blind volunteers using the same list, we found that their choices closely resembled those made by the sighted subjects. One man, who had been blind since birth, scored extremely well. He made only one match differing from the consensus, assigning ‘far’ to square and?‘near’ to circle. In fact, only a *all majority of sighted subjects – 53% – had paired far and near to the opposite partners. Thus, we concluded that the blind interpret abstract shapes as sighted people do.

所有的受試者都認為圓形表示柔軟而方塊表示堅硬。94%的人認為開心與圓形對應，而不是悲傷。也有一些詞組出現(xiàn)了不同的意見：79%的人在快-慢和強-弱對比上意見分別一致。而只有51%的人認為圓形表示深，方形表示淺。當我們用完全一樣的列表測試四個完全看不到的盲人時，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)他們的選擇與普通人的選擇非常相似。有個先天失明的人做得特別好。他只有一次連線與之前的移至答案不同，那就是把“遠”與方聯(lián)系起來，把近和圓聯(lián)系起來。事實上，只有剛剛53%的普通人在遠近上給出了相反的答案。因此，我們可以得出結論：盲人可以像普通人一樣理解抽象圖案的意義。

以上就是劍橋雅思9t3閱讀翻譯 誰有雅思9分達人閱讀3《The Bridge that Swayed>的答案，急用，謝謝全部內容了，了解更多相關信息，關注大學路。